Deploy Folding Table of contents
McLaren Responds to FIA’s Denial of Lando Norris’ Penalty Review Request
McLaren’s Official Statement
Following the decision made by the FIA to reject their petition for a review of Lando Norris’ penalty, McLaren has voiced its discontent with the governing body. The team disputes the FIA’s assertion that the evidence presented does not meet their operational standards. Nevertheless, McLaren is optimistic about maintaining future collaborations with the FIA.
Ongoing Controversy from the US Grand Prix
The dramatic encounter between Max Verstappen and Lando Norris during the final laps of the United States Grand Prix continues to stir debate even a week later. Norris received a five-second time penalty post-race in Austin due to overtaking Verstappen off the track. Curiously, McLaren .comy filed the review request a week after the event.
Stewards’ Rejection of McLaren’s Appeal
Recently, the stewards dismissed McLaren’s appeal, stating that the new evidence provided was insufficient under the FIA guidelines. Consequently, Verstappen retains his third-place finish in the Austin race. McLaren expressed surprise at the rejection, having hoped that their evidence would instigate a revision of the stewards’ initial ruling.
Looking Ahead: Collaboration with FIA
In their response, McLaren acknowledged the stewards’ decision on the review petition but expressed their disagreement. “We cannot accept the interpretation that an FIA document—which makes a participant aware of an objective, measurable, and provable error in the stewards’ ruling—cannot serve as an acceptable ‘element’ of proof meeting all four established criteria set forth by the International Sporting Code (ISC),” the team articulated in their statement.
The four criteria for admissible evidence include significance, relevance, novelty, and it must not have been available to the team previously. The FIA maintained that McLaren’s submission did not meet all these benchmarks. Still, McLaren conveyed gratitude for the expedited handling of the case. They reiterated their commitment to closely working with the FIA to better understand how teams can effectively challenge decisions that may inaccurately affect race classifications.
This incident highlights the evolving complexities of Formula 1 regulations and the importance of transparent communication between teams and governing bodies. Fans and analysts alike will be watching closely to see how this situation develops and what implications it may have for future races. The controversy surrounding the United States Grand Prix serves as a reminder of the intense scrutiny and passionate debates that define the world of Formula 1 racing.
As a young independent media, Leading Sport aneeds your help. Please support us by following us and bookmarking us on Google News. Thank you for your support!
